Adam Pohorecki

how about Rack::Static? Isn't that good enough?

There is no workaround for this, although the fix would be fairly simple - you can just strip argument names from the parameters list when comparing here: https://github.com/psyho/bogus/blob/master/lib/bogus/fakes/makes_ducks.rb#L33 However, this...

Thank you for your feedback. It's kind of tricky to make contract tests count as examples for RSpec. The reason for that is that contract tests need to be checked...

Thanks for reporting the issue. I just released version 0.1.6 which should have a fix for overwriting #described_class in RSpec 3.\* (it was a problem I encountered in our integration...

That's a shame, I'll look into this in more detail then. Thanks for checking.

I've spent some time debugging this issue today, and it looks like there's no reliable way to overwrite `described_class` in RSpec 3. I think I'm going to introduce a new...

This is a problem with contract tests that I'm aware of. Returning "real looking" data is sometimes problematic, because it leads to "noisy" tests (a lot of test body is...

I just released a version of bogus (0.1.6) that supports RBX (it didn't before), would you care to check if the problem still persists?

It's not possible at the moment unfortunately. I think it's a reasonable feature to have - we would like to support many different coding styles if possible. However, I'd prefer...

You're right - tracking down the missing interactions would be more confusing and difficult if we made it the default behavior. It would also be a breaking change instead of...