DatuX

I have to look in to it, it should indeed only have to list/thin snapshots in the target path that belong to the correct backup. If it doesnt, i would...

in that case the loop needs an extra if-statement that checks for if the correct autobackup:property is set.

Can you explain what you mean exactly? We already support multiple pools automaticly, just set the autobackup: property like usual, but on multiple pools. Edwin

Ah i understand. Can you try using --strip-path as workaround? In your example a --strip-path 1 should result in: ``` [host A]------------------[host B] ssd1/vm-100-disk-0 => ssd1/vm-100-disk-0 hdd/vm-100-disk-0 => ssd1/vm-100-disk-0 ```...

You basically want something like rsync for zfs pools? :)

Ok, first i have to fix some more stuff and then i'll figure out how to do this in a nice way.

update: the fixing some stuff turned into adding full regression testing and a lot of new features for 3.1. this one is still on the table however. :)

please have a look at #114 and let me know overthere what you think of it

In the mean time, if you want 1:1 replication on a per-pool basis, look here: https://github.com/psy0rz/zfs_autobackup/wiki#making-source-and-target-paths-look-the-same

This is a feature we should definitely have. I have to think about how to implement it in a clean way. Only a zfs send -R is not enough: We...