Christophe Prud'homme
Christophe Prud'homme
@vincentchabannes the configuration we did was not taken into account (wrong directory), now it is good and type:refactoring is one of the label that pin an issue
I don't think `dxx ...` is a good idea either. best is to have a function like you propose ```c++ d2(u,i,j) ```
@MichelFouquembergh @alixkien the 2D/3D code is there. There remains to finish implementing the RHT boundary conditions
@vincentchabannes if we compute extra fields in the postprocess step, are they available from the API ? We may want to compute the fields, use them in some other computations...
> I am not sure to understand. Field is a finite element function? If i run a time step of the fluid toolbox, and have an expression computing say the...
@vincentchabannes I move this to v107.
I have already compared and mp11 is the right choice imo I already played with it in a branch, I can push eventually @metivett boost::hana is not dropped, boost::hana is...
boost::hana is not pure tmp, it crosses the boundary. in many cases we just need pure tmp, but I agree that we use boost::hana more often. We still need to...
I would go for mp11 which is maintained by P Dimov, it is well documented, and I already used it in a few places. range-v3 is there until we get...
@vincentchabannes you have setup something like that no ? what is the process to stress the partitioner and feelpp mpi implementation