CryptoEconLab icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
CryptoEconLab copied to clipboard

[FIP Review]: FIP0047 Review - PoRep security policy

Open dmc314 opened this issue 3 years ago • 2 comments

Request Summary

please review FIP-0047 - PoRep security policy

Note that this is an Accpeted FIP and core devs are actively considering to finalize this FIP in the next immediate upgrade, currently targeted in Feb, 2023. For engineering development and upgrade planning, we'd appreciate insights from CEL before EOY!

Note from @anorth Note that this mechanism can be implemented now without needing to commit to parameters to adopt in case of an emergency. I think CEL attention is valuable, but modelling and simulations etc are about, e.g., selecting an appropriate termination fee

Audience / Consumer for this Review

Core Developers

Timeframe

Needed in 1 month

Rationale

No response

Desired Deliverables

No response

Additional Information

No response

Contact Details (if Private Response Requested)

No response

dmc314 avatar Dec 12 '22 21:12 dmc314

@SHSRPL , @tmellan , noting this issue here on our github for tracking purposes. Can you please update the issue with the relevant links, results, etc as they become available and close the issue when complete?

cc @jennijuju @irenegia @lucaniz @Kubuxu

dmc314 avatar Dec 12 '22 21:12 dmc314

Released analyses of FIP-0047 around fixing PoRep bugs in #cryptoeconomics slack channel. Concluded that a ProofRefreshWindow of approximately 30-60 days is optimal for making resealing more economically viable than not resealing. See the report for details

dmc314 avatar Jan 10 '23 18:01 dmc314