certification-tool icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
certification-tool copied to clipboard

[QUESTION] How to turn on PICS_EVENT_LIST_ENABLED flag?

Open Yinxq opened this issue 1 year ago • 7 comments

Describe the bug

For TC-BINFO-1.1, I noticed that some steps are skipped, checking the yaml file shows that this is because PICS_EVENT_LIST_ENABLED = False. Are these steps needed to be tested? If they are needed, how should I turn on PICS_EVENT_LIST_ENABLED flag?

Steps to reproduce the behavior

No response

Expected behavior

No response

Log files

No response

PICS file

Basic Information Test Plan.txt

Screenshots

image image image

Environment

TH version: matter-th-fall2023 matter version: v1.2.0.1

Additional Information

No response

Yinxq avatar Jan 19 '24 09:01 Yinxq

Hey @raju-apple, this seems like a PICS Tool issue. Who should be assigned here?

ccruzagralopes avatar Jan 22 '24 13:01 ccruzagralopes

Agustin , can you please respond on this ?

raju-apple avatar Jan 30 '24 17:01 raju-apple

Matter 1.2 Core Specificaiton Test Plan indicates that for TC-BINFO-1.1 step 5 is not supported. image

The PICS_EVENT_LIST_ENABLED appears to be TH variable (not a PICS element)

aperez-csa avatar Jan 30 '24 23:01 aperez-csa

Hi @aperez-csa, many thanks for your reply! These steps should be skipped.

I have another question. For TC-CNET-4.12, starting from step 8, in the verification section there is this sentence: Mark as not applicable and proceed to next step. Does this mean that these steps are not currently supported? image

Yinxq avatar Feb 01 '24 09:02 Yinxq

Event lists are provisional. They should not be on in a certified product.

cecille avatar Feb 01 '24 21:02 cecille

@cecille @aperez-csa I noticed that Event list is marked as M in the Matter-1.2-Core-Specification, but in the test plan it is marked as skippable, so which document should we use as the test standard when testing? eventlist

Minan-Tuyasmart avatar Feb 02 '24 08:02 Minan-Tuyasmart

Event list is not supported in 1.2. That it was not marked as P was a spec bug. @robszewczyk Do we have any way to mark spec errata for previous version?

cecille avatar Feb 20 '24 16:02 cecille

Interest on this seems to have faded out.

fabiowmm avatar Oct 10 '24 19:10 fabiowmm