PH-Submissions Build Review

[ZoeLeBlanc]

From our @programminghistorian/english-team team meeting discussions, realizing that we need to potentially review our build process for ph-submissions and whether adding a more robust build pipeline similar to Jekyll's Github Actions html checker would help limit errors when lessons are initially submitted.

Would be good to discuss further with @programminghistorian/technical-team, as well as @anisa-hawes about how this could support efforts to edit current onboarding documentation and processes.

[jenniferisasi]

In order to keep track of things we try, I want to add in this ticket that:

@ZoeLeBlanc updated her Ruby version (thanks to a tip by Brandon Walsh) and it cut the build speed in half; from 7 minutes down to 3 and a half.

She's now thinking about how everyone can update their Ruby or if we should start trying to created a docker instance.

More TBD.

[anisa-hawes]

I just want to link this to #2360.

@ZoeLeBlanc wonders if the tools @rivaquiroga and @nivaca are creating could eventually be integrated into checks that the submissions repository runs on new lesson file uploads.

[ZoeLeBlanc]

Closing this because we will discuss next steps with build options in #2738