Create Security Advanced section, mention Age, Minisign, Signify

[dngray]

Following on from https://github.com/privacyguides/privacyguides.org/pull/293#issuecomment-1086547448

I think it might be worthwhile to have a "Security Advanced" section as well as the "Security Basics". I do want to write an article for the Basics section that incorporates what is https://github.com/privacyguides/privacyguides.org/discussions/468

Likewise now that Infosec Handbook seems permanently offline, we could write an article which demonstrates Minisign, and Signify and their use with Age.

I think advanced guides are actually good, as well, because even IT fluent people, including developers often need guidance.

[samuel-lucas6]

That's a good idea. Shame their site has gone down; not sure what happened there as they were talking about rewriting old articles or something not that long ago.

[realguyman]

I believe all CLI applications should only be presented in the “Advanced Security” section.

[efb4f5ff-1298-471a-8973-3d47447115dc]

Would this also include something like 'only use ethernet cables at home instead of wifi?'

Edit: oh wait that is probably advanced privacy instead of security but i do still wonder if that is something worth mentioning on the site.

[privacyguides-bot]

This issue has been mentioned on Privacy Guides. There might be relevant details there:

https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/add-age-encryption/12366/2