privacyguides.org
privacyguides.org copied to clipboard
Add some other threat modeling links
This incorporates discussions from
- https://github.com/privacyguides/privacyguides.org/discussions/740
Note I did not include https://teamsammut.com/scf/ as it seems not really to our target audience. We could use a graphic on that page like that though. On a side note, I do like some of the pictures used in this article https://opsec101.org
- https://github.com/privacyguides/privacyguides.org/discussions/1631
Deploy Preview for privacyguides ready!
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | 2180dd107d4e22a3d5cff29ac22bd916d66eadc9 |
| Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/privacyguides/deploys/63eca2e5f94afb0008af62c5 |
| Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-1987--privacyguides.netlify.app/basics/threat-modeling |
| Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.
Going to convert this one to a draft, as I want to put some graphics on that page, so it's not a huge wall of text.
#740 saying that this page needs improvements is very out of date, we discussed this page extremely thoroughly when we did #1819 and #1276 and I think we were all happy with it, I don't really know what this adds.
If you like information from these other websites, I would rather that information be incorporated onto this page and those links added to the sources section instead, generally speaking I don't think we should direct people elsewhere for further reading.
If you like information from these other websites, I would rather that information be incorporated onto this page and those links added to the sources section instead, generally speaking I don't think we should direct people elsewhere for further reading.
Yes, which is why I did mark this as a draft. It is more of a reminder for me to think about how it could fit into the page.
Do we still want to do this @privacyguides/team?
I don't think we still want to do this, no.
Agreed, we don't really need to do this anymore, we've got a better page IMO