Nikolaus Piccolotto

No, [apparently](https://developer.github.com/v3/pulls/reviews/#get-a-single-review) there's no timestamp. Also we would run into the situation where there's a GH approval saying everything's fine and Zappr saying that a review is missing... Not the...

> isn't the "review" itself a "comment" (with a timestamp and all the bells) It's not. It's a "review" which is different from a "review comment" which is different from...

Any idea how to implement this? I'm thinking: - Store organizations of a user after login (`GET /users/:user/orgs`) and make them part of the User model - Implement proxy method...

I think this only needs the regex predicate, something like `(regex) => (data) => regex.test(data)`, and some tests (happy case, error cases, cases without regexes and strings). Regarding emails and...

Interesting, I was under the impression it should read one of `isInteger`, `int` or `integer` instead of `i`. Looks like I should test my [`getName`](https://github.com/prayerslayer/js.spec/blob/552dd102d795dd04d46a90c6015cbfaacc6db718/lib/util.js#L50) properly 😅 Thanks for reporting!

> I wonder if we just use a single quantify or repeat method that takes three parameters (low, high, spec)? This is similar to the linked pamatcher's repeat. I think...

Wow, thanks a lot for taking the time! It'll take a while until I can look over it thoroughly, possibly next Monday? I named `*` `kleene` because that's how they...

> Are we treating null and undefined the same? That's what I tried to do until now, yes. Both have the semantic "value does not exist." But I'm open for...

Wow, that's an interesting suggestion. I don't understand how this would work yet, but worth looking into 👍

Yes, it's definitely a cool feature of clojure.spec. I would like to have it in js.spec as well, by using testcheck-js if possible. The "roadmap" is basically [this part](https://github.com/prayerslayer/js.spec#implementation-status) of...