Prashant K. Jha
Prashant K. Jha
Hi @alizma, Could you please update how the review is progressing? I see that you have not yet created a checklist. I would appreciate it if you could get started...
> Hi @tmfrln, could you add a CONTRIBUTING.md file that discusses "guidelines for third parties wishing to 1) Contribute to the software 2) Report issues or problems with the software...
@KParas, could you please provide an update on your review? Thanks!
Hi @KParas, please provide an update on your review. It has been too long, and we need to speed up the review, please. There are a lot of items remaining...
@alizma, could you please provide an update on your review? Thanks!
Hi @KParas, thank you for letting me know. I sincerely hope everything gets sorted out. Yes, January end will work but it has to be a hard deadline. Please let...
Dear @alizma and @KParas, we are running significantly behind, and I would greatly appreciate it if you could finish the review soon. Please share the update and realistic timeline by...
Hi, @alizma and @KParas. We are now significantly behind schedule. I have not heard from both of you, and you have ignored my pings. Please let me know if you...
Howdy, @Huzaifg, @lelaus, @Brookluo, @jannisteunissen, would you be interested in reviewing the JOSS submission above ([pdf link](https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.05729/joss.05729/10.21105.joss.05729.pdf))? The corresponding software is at this [link](https://github.com/tmfrln/paraqus). This [link](https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html) covers almost everything about...
Hi @jstollberg, the delay is due to two reviewers ghosting us completely. I will try to find one more reviewer, and based on their assessment and @alizma's partial assessment, it...