Arnaud Poncet-Montanges

Drop before dump or alter dump procedure indeed.

@bogdanvaduva Thanks for the illustrations, this looks very promising! It would be nice to invite you to one of our PSC in 2019. Actually we are very busy with getting...

@lbartoletti I let you decide with @haubourg and @elemoine what is the best way to proceed. I'm OK with any correction that makes the dump reliable for users.

sigip views are yet not more referencing production views.

Probably used for communes du Valais. ping @tproduit? Est-ce que la présence de conduite de haute pression se retrouve dans les modèles d'eau potable ou est-elle associée à des modèles...

IMHO we should adress this as a postgis issue because 'POINT(100 100 0)' != 'POINT(100 100 1)'));

If you feel st_force2d is used in vain and cost processing time (in the st_equal context), feel free to propose a removal proposition for this. Removing useless complexity is always...

That's one of the reasons I asked to include CREATE and DROP mechanisms into PUM. https://github.com/opengisch/pum/issues/16

@sylvainbeo I agree on that point, what is it not created by PUM should not be dropped by PUM. But qwat_test and qwat_comp are PUM required DBs which are created...

@m-kuhn Miss an added schema, an added group_role, an added rule, an added type. With that we should be exhaustive? **Edit:** set group_role instead of role after @haubourg's comment.