Paulo Valente
Paulo Valente
That looks good, but I'd format it with a markdown table so ex doc renders it nicely. The guard (I wrote defmacro but should have been defguard there) covers the...
Yes. Or require it. But that's a lot more manageable than aliasing N different structs
@isaacsanders by "serialize messages"/"serialization" point I meant that messages will be processed in sequence instead of concurrently if you centralize them onto a single process
> > I'm not sure if we should discuss the error details mentioned in #109? > > Maybe yes Since there's a specific issue for that and a WIP PR,...
If there was a way to publish cowboy 2.9.1 with the requirement relaxed to the equivalent of Mix's `~> 2.11` that would also be acceptable, but I do not know...
It's https://github.com/elixir-grpc/grpc
Yeah! To be clear, take can be replaced by gather (look at how EXLA does it) at the Nx level. take_along_axis also can be, but as an optional callback (again...
Torchx should have the specific implementation. EXLA and BinaryBackend can use the default that delegates to gather
@Benjamin-Philip I believe you can experiment a bit with the `:axes` option from gather to replicate `take`. What I meant by looking into the EXLA implementation is that in [this...
> @polvalente, let me know if just copy pasting this will work, or if we should go with some other approach: > > https://github.com/elixir-nx/nx/blob/bead39ccd703cd9243e985659b2905eea8977862/torchx/lib/torchx/backend.ex#L340-L384 That would work, but I think...