Lennart Poettering
Lennart Poettering
> Given it's intended for non-interactive users, maybe `[email protected]` or `[email protected]`? That's how non-interactive systems are usually called, so it would be immediately clear what it is for But [email protected]...
> `systemctl start --headless foo.service` seems nice and intuitive to me i don't understand what that would do?
btw, i stole the "project" name from the "project quota" thing that solaris (and now linux has)
> > > > The regular one uses logind and pam, no? Isn't that the key difference? That's one major difference. But what is super important is that it uses...
> Is this a requirement? It'd be great if we could do both. Either you instantiate this for a user that already exists and then we run as that user,...
I force pushed a new version of this. This should be ready for review now. v256 material. I quite like it. It's really simple, but feels very powerful. I made...
> CI test still missing. Added now too.
> The name as is will make it all but impossible to search for this - googling "systemd project documentation" or so will never return the right thing. I find...
> [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])? This suggests that this was used to implement DynamicUser=1, but it's really not. This is one *use* of DynamicUser=1, but just one of many. It would be like...
"[email protected]" points the user to one single implementation detail of the concept. Dynamic users is not what this stuff is about at all.