Paulo Cesar

:+1: pushed the "release candidate" to the 1.0.0 branch. all tests passing include more use cases from the tickets, but I'm missing the prototype inheritance test using the `objectPath.Class.call(this, options)`...

hey @mariocasciaro. Typescript is a superset of Javascript (Typescript is valid Javascript when it's not annotated (using the variable types), and Javascript is 100% valid Typescript, unlike other transpilers like...

Well, I've been using typescript for almost 2 years now, and it helped me imensely to write quality code. But don't worry, I can keep the Typescript on my repo...

Yeah, I was just waiting for your feedback on my post above. Should I implement the JSCS to keep format consistent? (including PRs)

@mariocasciaro Revisiting this issue, the new Typescript 1.6 version can create typings that doesn't need to include the original typescript file. Also, it favors typings encapsulation instead of declaring global...

Yup, totally agree. Standing in the shoulder of giants (like lodash / underscore and now their merge) the focus is on splitting the internals into separate exports, so people using...

hey @mariocasciaro here's the upcoming version. https://github.com/pocesar/object-path/tree/1.0.0 disregard the typescript files for now, and it's missing the global objectPath inside the UMD. the tests are passing, support for `Symbol()` is...

hey @mariocasciaro, while I understand your point of view, I disagree with it. Lodash functions itself have many different outputs for the same function (see [reduce](https://lodash.com/docs#reduce), [debounce](https://lodash.com/docs#debounce), [throttle](https://lodash.com/docs#throttle) or [clone](https://lodash.com/docs#clone)...

@mariocasciaro I don't plan to fork object-path, it would do nothing good doing so. I'll do as you say, I'll remove anything that is related to classes and state, but...

oh I missed this one. yeah, a configurable option would be nice. would it be global? like: ``` js objectPath.options.numberAsArray = false | true; ``` or implement a constructor to...