Paul Norman

We should use square meters in mercator for all areas.

I'm +1 on including this in the next minor version as well as [`avalanche_protector`](https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tunnel=avalanche_protector). Are we better off having false for tunnel=no, no attribute for no tunnel tag, and tunnel=yes...

For a proposal to vote on, I propose adding "flooded" and "avalanch_protector" to the list of tunnel values. The question of default values can be addressed as part of #45

What languages would the readme need too be translated into, and who would both translate it and keep it up to date?

I was going to use this but rubocop didn't like constants in blocks. I can easily disable that cop[^1] but it reminded me *why* I wasn't a fan of this...

0.0.9 was published but it doesn't seem up to date with the source https://my.diffend.io/gems/glug/0.0.8/0.0.9 shows the differences between the two, and https://github.com/systemed/glug/commit/886a443618fba7d66067de44fb3281235fb6beff is one change missing.

I'm not opposed to changing and have been using main for some time. Before considering it we would need to know what impacts it would have, particularly on existing PRs....

> That's a good point! > > Is it okay this way? We still haven't decided on a policy in openstreetmap/operations#1263. Once that is decided we'll know what the URLs...

I'd rather drop this field completely. We should either have users - use `kind` to determine if something is a railway or - drop kind and have highway and railway...

I'd go with the `area:aeroway` tag and would be okay changing it in 1.1. In most cases it's a moot point because you don't want to label runway and taxiway...