Peter Monks

@scd "table stakes" are features that are required in order to be considered to have delivered a minimally viable product. For platforms that provide "social" features (forums, chat, etc.), the...

> Maybe we cannot support the social functions anymore. @scd I'd have no problem with that, though others might disagree. These features enable all kinds of bad behaviour (the user...

> Making your account private will achieve what you want. If your account is private then only the people you want to see your personal content will be able to...

> I don't disagree that we need to do more. Disruptive comments in a public forum should be resolved for everybody not just block for one person. There are probably...

@killakalle that's nice, but it only provides half the standard block functionality. Those users can still see my content.

@scd look at every consumer grade platform with social features out there. Heck even [GitHub has a robust end-user block function you could draw inspiration from](https://docs.github.com/en/communities/maintaining-your-safety-on-github/blocking-a-user-from-your-personal-account).

Am I correct in seeing that the trial block functionality was removed relatively recently? If so, what are the plans (if any) to reintroduce it, or better yet blocking functionality...

Another thought: should the `LineColumn` class be enhanced to include all of the information that's displayed in the difference message? That would allow `getDifferenceMessage()` to become a "dumb" string generator...

Ooooh this seems like a very handy addition to the `discljord` org! Does it also make decisions around configuration management, logging, etc.?

PR #236 includes unit tests that reproduce this problem, albeit with other license texts - the issue is not limited to just `GPL-2.0`, or indeed even just GPL family licenses....