Petar Mlinarić

> Also not having to pass `ast_pole_data` for norms is nice. Do you think it's ok for `ast_pole_data` to be fixed as an attribute of a model? Then `get_ast_spectrum` could...

> > I'm not sure what you mean. The demo runs fine for me. > > The demo does, but the tutorial does not. For example the line `fdbt =...

@lbalicki Thanks @sdrave What do you think?

Thanks all.

I now pushed the changes I'm comfortable with. Basically, I propose caching the result of `lu_factor`, checking the condition number, and solving using `lu_solve`, and adding other options in a...

@sdrave I made some changes regarding time-dependent parameters. What do you think?

> Aside from the changes @sdrave and @artpelling suggested it looks good to me. As a general question: Does it perhaps make sense to pass time-stepping information from the FOM...

> > Aside from the changes @sdrave and @artpelling suggested it looks good to me. As a general question: Does it perhaps make sense to pass time-stepping information from the...

One more question is how to deal with discrete-time systems. In that case, it doesn't seem like it should be necessary to specify a time-stepper for `LTIModel`, but should there...

> > One more question is how to deal with discrete-time systems. In that case, it doesn't seem like it should be necessary to specify a time-stepper for `LTIModel`, but...