Burak Arslan
Burak Arslan
The coverage reports should give a good idea about what needs testing. https://spyne.ci.cloudbees.com/job/spyne/PYFLAV=2.7/73/cobertura/_default_/
you need to take a deeper look then, sadface.
I'll accept this with some modifications. I don't remember why the seek is needed but it's best to wrap it in another exception handling block if it's there to prevent...
questions go to the mailing list. I see that the provided patches hardcode "parameters". I can't accept them. I can accept a patch that parametrizes the value though.
Hello, Thanks for taking the time to report this. I'll be happy accept pull requests that address this issue the following way: 1. Make `ServerBase` accept an optional `AllYourInterfaceDocuments` instance....
Hey, thanks for the workaround, it's always nice to have these around :) However I still would prefer this to be implemented cleanly, so I won't close the issue. Thanks...
You can validate email addresses using regular expressions up to a point. That doesn't cover your use case?
Hi there, Is there any particular reason why you don't use lxml validation? It's both complete and its errors are quite verbose.
The reason I "force" users to choose between validators is because none is objectively superior to another. - For some people who need to deal with buggy clients, lxml validation...
The docs are a bit unclear. LOCAL_TZ is only forced for validation