`@plone/contents` - Enhance Contents View

[sneridagh]

PLIP (Plone Improvement Proposal)

Responsible Persons

Proposer: Víctor Fernández de Alba (@sneridagh)

Seconder:

Abstract

Overhaul, and refactor the contents view. Move it to use own core package @plone/contents, so it's portable to other frameworks or platforms (electron, ionic, etc...) or even use it in Plone ClassicUI

It should address these issues:

• [ ] Use react-aria-components for better accessibility support
• [x] https://github.com/plone/volto/issues/5620
• [ ] https://github.com/plone/volto/issues/5677 (partially solves #5620)
• [ ] https://github.com/plone/volto/issues/5617
• [ ] https://github.com/plone/volto/issues/5566
• [x] https://github.com/plone/volto/issues/5549

Motivation

The contents view is a key element for managing content and should have the best support and UX possible. In addition, we should improve it in order to make it a true mini-app detached from the "site frame", so the usability is better (see Quanta mocks).

https://www.figma.com/file/YpaRSKjFcFaAkVYnTSVGuz/Volto-UI-%E2%80%93-Quanta?type=design&node-id=1780-534&t=APRtPBwzIc5APzxL-4

Assumptions

No preconditions.

Proposal & Implementation

Refactor the contents view:

• Use own core package @plone/contents
• Use TypeScript
• Better slicing of components so they are easily shadowable
• Don't use SemanticUI on it, use react-aria-components
• Use @plone/client instead of the Volto redux-based request API

Deliverables

Refactored Contents.jsx (and child components) using the Tanstack table library. Documentation on how to use it outside Volto

Risks

No risks.

Participants

@iFlameing Put your name here.

[tisto]

@sneridagh what's the status of this? Do we still plan to tackle this in Plone 6.1? Otherwise, I'd move it to 6.2 in our roadmap...

[sneridagh]

@iFlameing you've been working on this, right? What's the status?

[sneridagh]

@tisto nope, I think there will be not enough time for this in 6.1.

[tisto]

@sneridagh I moved this to Plone 6.2 in the roadmap, ok with you?

[sneridagh]

@tisto this is not going to happen in 6.1, that's for sure.

My doubt is if we should maintain several projects one for each "desirable" release. Are you aware and you take a look at: https://github.com/orgs/plone/projects/33 ?

I'd go for a milestone rather than use a project for the minor releases. Let's talk about it.