plk
plk
That would be good. I think most biblatex releases break tex4ht.
No rush. Likely 3.4 will be out before then and there is one large-ish change to prefixnumber handling to address some user issues and limitations (see CHANGES file which I...
If we can help at all by putting code into biblatex to ease the tex4ht releases, I'm all for it - tex4ht is an important package for a lot of...
Just so you know @josephwright - there is a meagre start to this already in the `build` subdir of the biblatex dist. I had implemented some tests for the range...
Well, what happens currently is that I compile all of the test files in the `examples/` folder (the `obuild/build.sh` script does this automatically but to use it you might have...
I would only bother with tests for `biber`.
I'm in favour of uniformity as this always comes back to bite one in the future. It's a relatively niche option and so a note in the Changes file should...
Assuming @moewew has no objection, I have removed the warning completely for 3.19 as `biber` has been the default for a long time now and we can assume anyone explicitly...
Ah, good point - that's clearly a bibtex/bibtex8 reference - coming from a UNIX background it really does look like a manual page section reference. We could put an option...
@moewew - How about, since biblatex warnings are all wrapped in various warn/error macros, we add a general flag to not print warnings to the terminal? I'm assuming that Karl...