plk
plk
Have you tried the latest 2.19 universal?
Apologies, I meant the 2.20 DEV binary: https://sourceforge.net/projects/biblatex-biber/files/biblatex-biber/development/binaries/MacOS/
I'm assuming that if you try the ARM64 binary from the same location, you get the same error?
Ah, right, there is no ARM64 on there - you can get the ARM64 binary by getting the universal and running: ``` lipo -extract arm64 -output biberarm64 biber ``` Then...
I think this is because you are running 12.4 and the M1 I build on is 14.1. I assume they've updated zilb. I don't have spare M1s to keep on...
A new build has been made for 2.20 - you can try that now as it is released.
This basically needs an upgrade of my linux 64 build machine. It's on Ubuntu 10.10 currently to be as backwards compatible as possible. Every few years it needs an upgrade...
Can you try the DEV version 2.20 for x86_64 linux? It's now compiled on 16.04LTS which should be a bit better. https://sourceforge.net/projects/biblatex-biber/files/biblatex-biber/development/binaries/Linux/biber-linux_x86_64.tar.gz/download
Not really, you need the corresponding `biblatex` version which for `biber` 2.20 is `biblatex` 3.20 dev version which you can get from Sourceforge.
This is usually just because there is an issue getting the remote definitions file mentioned in the `.bcf` for that test: https://webspace.science.uu.nl/~bodla101/graphs-bib/definitions.bib You can usually just ignore errors in the...