hub m2m-token: allow to configure multiple authorities

Jun 28 '24 13:06 jkralik

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

More than 25% of the files skipped due to max files limit. The review is being skipped to prevent a low-quality review.

22 files out of 79 files are above the max files limit of 50. Please upgrade to Pro plan to get higher limits.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
- @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`)

You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Jun 28 '24 13:06 coderabbitai[bot]

https://github.com/plgd-dev/hub/pull/1336#discussion_r1663991640

This depends on the cluster where the hub is running. In production, each user needs to set up their own cluster. If we set the limits too low, the processes will be killed by OOM (Out of Memory) errors.

Jul 04 '24 06:07 jkralik

@coderabbitai review

Jul 04 '24 08:07 jkralik

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Jul 04 '24 08:07 coderabbitai[bot]

@coderabbitai summary

Jul 04 '24 08:07 jkralik

Actions performed

Summary regeneration triggered.

Jul 04 '24 08:07 coderabbitai[bot]

@coderabbitai summary

Jul 04 '24 17:07 jkralik

Actions performed

Summary regeneration triggered.

Jul 04 '24 17:07 coderabbitai[bot]

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

More than 25% of the files skipped due to max files limit. The review is being skipped to prevent a low-quality review.

22 files out of 79 files are above the max files limit of 50. Please upgrade to Pro plan to get higher limits.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
- @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`)

You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Jul 04 '24 17:07 coderabbitai[bot]

@coderabbitai create summary over files under m2m-oauth-server directory and helm chart

Jul 04 '24 17:07 jkralik

[!TIP] For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@jkralik, here is the summary of the changes:

`m2m-oauth-server` Directory

File: m2m-oauth-server/test/test.go
- Removed a large block of commented-out code that included a RequestBuilder struct and associated methods, as well as an HTTPDo function.

Helm Chart

No changes detected in the Helm chart files.

If you need further details or have any other requests, please let me know.

Analysis chain

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List changes under the m2m-oauth-server directory
echo "Changes in m2m-oauth-server directory:"
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 HEAD | grep 'm2m-oauth-server'

# List changes in Helm chart files
echo "Changes in Helm chart files:"
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 HEAD | grep 'helm'

Length of output: 289

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Show the diff of the specific file that changed in the m2m-oauth-server directory
echo "Diff for m2m-oauth-server/test/test.go:"
git diff HEAD~1 HEAD m2m-oauth-server/test/test.go

Length of output: 2068

Learnings added

Learnt from: jkralik
URL: https://github.com/plgd-dev/hub/pull/1336

Timestamp: 2024-07-04T17:35:40.654Z
Learning: When summarizing changes in a pull request, include details from the specified directories and files, noting both modifications and absence of changes.

Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.

Jul 04 '24 17:07 coderabbitai[bot]

@coderabbitai create summary over all files under m2m-oauth-server and charts directories

Jul 04 '24 17:07 jkralik

[!TIP] For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@jkralik, here is the updated summary of the changes:

`m2m-oauth-server` Directory

File: m2m-oauth-server/test/test.go
- Removed a large block of commented-out code that included a RequestBuilder struct and associated methods, as well as an HTTPDo function.

`charts` Directory

No changes detected in the charts directory.

If you need further details or have any other requests, please let me know.

Analysis chain

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List and show changes under the m2m-oauth-server directory
echo "Changes in m2m-oauth-server directory:"
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 HEAD | grep 'm2m-oauth-server'

echo "Diffs for files in m2m-oauth-server directory:"
for file in $(git diff --name-only HEAD~1 HEAD | grep 'm2m-oauth-server'); do
  echo "Diff for $file:"
  git diff HEAD~1 HEAD $file
done

# List and show changes under the charts directory
echo "Changes in charts directory:"
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 HEAD | grep 'charts'

echo "Diffs for files in charts directory:"
for file in $(git diff --name-only HEAD~1 HEAD | grep 'charts'); do
  echo "Diff for $file:"
  git diff HEAD~1 HEAD $file
done

Length of output: 2734

Jul 04 '24 17:07 coderabbitai[bot]

@coderabbitai create a description for whole pull request based on m2m-oauth-server and charts directories

Jul 04 '24 17:07 jkralik

[!TIP] For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@jkralik, here is the comprehensive description of the pull request based on changes in the m2m-oauth-server and charts directories:

Pull Request Description

Objective

The primary objective of this pull request is to allow configuring multiple authorities for m2m-token.

Changes in `m2m-oauth-server` Directory

File: m2m-oauth-server/test/test.go
- Removed a large block of commented-out code that included:
  - RequestBuilder struct and associated methods (NewRequestBuilder, AddQuery, Build).
  - HTTPDo function.

Changes in `charts` Directory

No changes detected.

This cleanup in the m2m-oauth-server directory helps in maintaining a cleaner codebase and removing unused code. If there are any specific changes related to the configuration of multiple authorities for m2m-token that are not evident in the provided diffs, please let me know so I can include them in the description.

If you need further details or have any other requests, please let me know.

Analysis chain

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List all files under the m2m-oauth-server and charts directories and show their diffs
echo "Listing all files under m2m-oauth-server and charts directories:"
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 HEAD | grep -E 'm2m-oauth-server|charts'

echo "Diffs for files in m2m-oauth-server and charts directories:"
for file in $(git diff --name-only HEAD~1 HEAD | grep -E 'm2m-oauth-server|charts'); do
  echo "Diff for $file:"
  git diff HEAD~1 HEAD $file
done

Length of output: 2596

Jul 04 '24 17:07 coderabbitai[bot]