pkrukp

@MarcoRossignoli why is it marked as feature request? As I understand this is a bug: > The problem is that the non used assembly is generating NON EXISTING branches That...

I don't know if this issue is still present, don't have repro, maybe @pape77 could comment?

Thanks, I hoped you have some small repro that shows the "ghost branches" that you could share, I understand if you don't have it.

I thought it simply collects coverage from executed application...

Do you know when that next version will be available?

Hmm some additional data. Maybe the problem lies in the coverlet.console and/or the dotnet global tool? ### Details I can collect coverage from Full PDB from UT. For Application coverage,...

I have tested with older nunit versions. It looks like the change happened in 3.11.0: > nunit 3.10.1 (3.10.0) + vstest 15.6.2: OK > nunit 3.10.1 (3.10.0) + vstest 15.9.0:...

I noticed https://github.com/nunit/nunit3-vs-adapter/pull/510 which says: > Add a CollectDataForEachTestSeparately setting > Add a setting to make NUnit run tests sequentially, making the InProcDataCollectors receive the events before a test starts...

@rprouse it's as @OsirisTerje said, I was switching both - i.e. I had framework 3.10.1 and adapter 3.10.0 (latest 3.10.x) and then switched both to 3.11.0 (latest 3.11.x)

@rprouse yes, I wrote about it 5 days ago ;) https://github.com/nunit/nunit3-vs-adapter/issues/560#issuecomment-438636936