async-runtimes-benchmarks
async-runtimes-benchmarks copied to clipboard
pkolaczk
This version of the benchmark for Python works faster than #3
1. Almost no one does so many tasks. 2. C# to open tasks generally use Task.Factory.StartNew 3. C# performed poorly in this test. Because the final situation does not need...
Significantly improves .NET's code, closes https://github.com/pkolaczk/async-runtimes-benchmarks/pull/4 - Updated to .NET 7 - Dropped `ImplicitUsings` in [`dotnet.csproj`](https://github.com/pkolaczk/async-runtimes-benchmarks/blob/f791c74e6b4a4a1f8e31833624fb288f24bedc23/dotnet/dotnet.csproj#L6) - Uses an array (`Task[]`) over a list (`List`) to [prevent constant resizing of...
Hi, thank you for the benchmark and interesting blog post! I wanted to discuss it with my friends and tweak some code to see how it afffects the result. But...
`stack run coroutines 1000000` (1M) uses 12GB of RAM on my machine.
Just questions about this article: https://pkolaczk.github.io/memory-consumption-of-async/ Does anyone know why rust tokio using less memory than rust traditional thread?
In the article bench, u said u used node `12.22.9` why so old? instead of the LTS (18)
- No need to create a `list` object, which will consume some RAM. - Take advantage of Python generator and `*` operator.
