Peter Williams

CC @CraftSpider here too.

Hmm, I'm not sure why this error would only be showing up in the cross-tests. The one thing that I can think of is that those run through the `cross`...

Well, based on the discussion in #891, it seemed like there were a number of people interested in having such a feature. I have to confess that I personally don't...

Sorry, I didn't explicitly say so before — a PR would definitely be welcome! Especially with test coverage, and if you can mention it in the documentation, that would be...

Thanks for the suggestion! Getting it to compile might indeed be a challenge, but we already have the proof-of-concept that we can build Tectonic for fuzzing, so it should be...

Hi @ColeFrench — thanks for pursuing on this; more test coverage is always better! I just wanted to inquire about the status here, since this PR hasn't changed for a...

You have the right idea. I am not sure how/why the example that you are using works, but in Tectonic at least, the initex-style mode starts with a truly pristine...

Thanks for mentioning this. I am not sure if this issue affects Tectonic in practice. We only use `hyper` as a server in the test suite, where the version requirement...

Well, I want to make sure that we are on top of any security concerns even if they're formalities. Please let me know if we can take any steps to...

To check that I'm understanding correctly, are you imagining something similar to the `--open` option that `tectonic build` already has? That would definitely be a sensible addition, and could reuse...