Paul Johnson comments

Results 100 comments of


                                            Paul Johnson

no coverage for Catalyst app under Starman

Work on this is in the opfreehook branch.

cover command performance issue

Thanks very much for reporting this. Did you manage to get any further with it? If you still think it's an IO speed problem that can be reasonably solved in...

Devel::Cover breaks code that relies on subroutine attributes

Thanks very much for this report. I think it is actually pointing to a bug in perl itself. Notice that if you run this test under the debugger it will...

Difference in coverage between cpancover.com and local build

It seems that there was some sort of problem with PDL. Thanks very much for letting me know. I'll have a more detailed look into it.

Difference in coverage between cpancover.com and local build

That makes sense. Thanks for checking on the logs. (I want to make that easier to do, but just getting them available was a good first step.) I'll look into...

Difference in coverage between cpancover.com and local build

I think it will be necessary to implement some sort of mechanism for install OS packages, or something. I don't want to implement a package manager and I don't want...

unclear how to start using Devel::Cover

I think what you'll need to do is set `PERL5OPT=-MDevel::Cover` and then just run your _prove_ command. You may also need to explicitly ignore your _carton_ dependencies. So you might...

-add_uncoverable_line fails

I think you are correct. This is an area of the code which is not well tested, but after having it in place for a while I thought it better...

Full conditional coverage not recorded for three-variable boolean expressions

Thanks very much for finding and reporting this, and for the detective work. I suspect that the optree changed between those two versions and the change went unnoticed until now....

Condition coverage of 'not(a) or not(b)' differs from not( a and b)

Thanks very much for reporting this. You are correct that the two statements should produce identical coverage and, athough the optrees differ, the B::Deparse output for the two is identical....