Ability to customize how coverage is reported on cpancover.com

[haarg]

Some dists aren't fully covered by their standard tests in t, but only by extra tests that may be in a separate directory, or conditional on an environment variable.

Moo is one example of this. The report on cpancover.com shows the overall statement coverage as 90%, with some modules going as low as 40%. There are also some modules not listed on the report at all. If Moo's xt tests are run as well, the statement coverage will be 100%.

I would like some way to customize how cpancover.com is doing the coverage reporting. Having a documented environment variable set would probably be be the simplest thing. Then the Makefile.PL/Build.PL could adjust the dependencies and tests to be run as needed.

[pjcj]

Yes, something along these lines is important. Thanks for noting it.