piyushredpanda
piyushredpanda
@WillemKauf Presumably we would also want this in v24.1.x (though please don't merge today); the template did not have that backport option because when the PR was opened, we did...
@nivekuil : do you have any logs you could share with us and relevant details like the amount of data you had on the node that was decommissioned? The status...
Ah, but this is suspect. > calculated reallocations: {} cc: @dotnwat
/backport v22.3.x
/backport v22.2.x
@kargh : Thanks for the report, we are looking into it. To clarify though, we do not support a downgrade. Also, presumably this is a 1-node cluster -- is that...
@emaxerrno, yes @kargh also mentioned they downgraded the cluster: > Downgraded from 22.3.2 to 22.3.1 which is what I was trying to clarify we do not support, for future reference.
@BenPope : what do we need here? Trying to see if this will be part of v22.3.5 due this week or needs to slip beyond it.
Can you please update the release notes section to have a better 1-liner explanation?