pixelherodev

Relative labels are in, so this... _should_ be fine? Going to finish testing scas on all of our packages first.

#3435 refers specifically to designated initialization from enum values, this proposal is referring specifically to partial array initialization. They're two separate proposals.

I can reproduce this issue. I've taken to switching to an unused TTY before turning the monitor off, and switching back to sway after turning the monitor on

I'm heading out to a friend's wedding tomorrow; I'll do a git bisect when I get back if nobody's taken a closer look by then :)

~~I don't think I can reproduce this anymore~~ I misremembered the repro steps, can repro still with 1.9.

Arduino is AVR-based, so really it's just a matter of waiting for LLVM's AVR support to stabilize, and adding support to the standard library. In theory, basic language support should...

So, should standard functionality be implemented in os.arduino? I can definitely do that at some point in the next month if that's desired. Edit: the other question then is how...

This includes 9front's new atomics support, and other than that is mostly just disabling some things that don't work properly on 9front (threading, ev, etc). Some of the floating point...

Tested using a light patch to NPE, at http://shithub.us/pix/npe/HEAD/info.html . Instructions for building on plan9, that should work fully self-contained: ``` git/clone gits://shithub.us/pix/npe cd npe mk install cd .. git/clone...

(For one last bit of context, previous attempt was Janet 1.26. This is the first time I've had a newer binary than that working, let alone one that's _almost_ good...