Jesús Leganés-Combarro

> This is great, it's super aligned with the plan for v3. In the new version we're not focusing on network tasks, but in pausable, queued, async side-effects. Thanks for...

Ok, our project has progressed and we have reviewed redux-offline source code, now we have a clearer view of what we need. It's not about having multiple instances of redux-offline...

Yes, `enqueue()` function is ideal for this, at https://github.com/redux-offline/redux-offline/pull/337 you have one example of that.

@mikestaub, can you provide more details how did you fix it? I'm facing the same problem testing a library that internally makes use of `redux-offline`...

@mikestaub, I have tried with both your implementation and the one at https://github.com/clarkbw/jest-localstorage-mock and in both cases I still get the error, with the difference that by using these ones...

@echoes221, I have check with your code sample and it works, and yes, with `setupFilesAfterEnv` worked but with `setupFiles` didn't, don't know why it didn't with setting it globally in...

Err... no, wrong success, it still shows the warning: ``` console.warn node_modules/redux-persist/lib/defaults/asyncLocalStorage.js:100 redux-persist localStorage test failed, persistence will be disabled. ``` At least tests are passing, and I'm not interested...

Not sure if webpack allows this, but could it be possible to do a two-pass scan? This way the first one could search for all the environment variables used in...

Maybe asking to `webpack` devs? I would like to know too...

Can there be any fix for this issue in Webpack 5?