Official npm package would really help

[NicolasReibnitz]

Hey Philip,

I know that somebody already made an npm package, and it seems to be up to date and all. But having an official "pipwerks" package, preferably using an org like "@pipwerks/scorm-api-wrapper," would help identify the real deal. I always end up "researching" which package it was that you mentioned a million years ago. And I see that you already have an account on npm. So this shouldn't be too much of a hassle. I'd love to help, but there is clearly nothing that I can do here, right?

In any case, thanks for the many years of your unrelenting service to this small community and for making this package in the first place! What would I do without it?

Take care! Nicolas

[pipwerks]

Hi Nicolas

It's a tricky thing, for a number of reasons. The wrapper doesn't follow the module pattern, and unlike the forked version, if I were to use the module pattern I would likely want to rewrite the entire package to conform to modern best practices (this is a pretty old script!). Adding to NPM would also mean one more project for me to manage, and frankly I don't have a lot of spare time these days. But I will definitely give it some (more) thought.

Thanks