piotrva

I think we may go with this one first, as it is a complete one and yesterday I resolved all conflicts with main branch. These two additional PRs are not...

@wimalopaan I was thinking about it but for such a feature we would need to agree how to mark checkable/non-checkable items. From programming point of view the best solution would...

> Do you have a preferred order for the review/merging of #1395, #1417 (this PR) and #1425? I'm thinking this one first since it's clear and is the active one,...

@wimalopaan Would be grateful if you give your opinion about the feature now. Finally I decided to use a single-character (as it greatly simplifies the code responsible for omitting non-checkable...

@pfeerick thanks for merging #1395, so we are left with this one and #1425

> Sorry for the delay, didn't see the notification for this. I'll trade you review of this for testing of #1548 since I know you have a TX12 also. 😁...

@wimalopaan - any thoughts on the status of this feature now?

@eshifri - if the setting is not present in the companion - it will not be displayed and probably would be lost when transferring settings from companion to radio.

@Eldenroot To keep it flexible and simple simultaneously I decided to: - have warning title (short text) with ability to be edited from radio - have warning text to be...

Observed even more drastic behavior with Polish passport - both on Linux and Windows machines Proxmark3 hardware reboots after a few seconds following read command...