pino-pretty
pino-pretty copied to clipboard
can we rename `outputStream` to `destination` to match pino v5 parlance
Due to the addition of pino.destination
, and that fact SonicBoom
kind of is and kind of isn't a stream, the adoption of the term "destination" has become prevalent in the v5 documentation.
For parity with pino, in the next-major
branch, are there any arguments against renaming outputStream
option to destination
.
oh hold on a second it looks like the outputStream
default option isn't used at all
@jsumners can you clarify?
+1 on using destination.
Best guess is it's a vestige of the original implementation.