tidb
tidb copied to clipboard
infoschema: keep the timestamp of infoschema v2 updating
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #52683 ref #50959
Problem Summary:
It's casued by compatibility issue between infoschema v2 and GC worker.
For infoschema v2, it contains a ts field, SchemaTables and loadTableInfo need this ts to get the corresponding schema meta snapshot.
We store the schemaTS as the ts of an infoschema v2 object in the past.
Whether it's schemaTS or startTS does not matter, because they both use the same schema version and data.
But when we're using schemaTS, it's not up to date.
For example, a DDL happened 30 minutes ago. (so the ts of infoschema v2 object is 30 min ago)
GC happened 10 minutes ago.
Now we get the infoschema v2 object, and use it, we would get the "GC life time is shorter than transaction duration" error.
What changed and how does it work?
Instead of using schemaTS for infoschema v2 object, we can change to use startTS,
and keep the startTS updating in domain load schema loop periodically.
So that we can get rid of the "GC life time is shorter than transaction duration" error.
Check List
Tests
- [ ] Unit test
- [ ] Integration test
- [X] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
Start a cluster and wait for GC, and see no panic. Not easy to do that in unit test because GC is mocked and not really the same as real tikv.
- [ ] No need to test
- [ ] I checked and no code files have been changed.
Side effects
- [ ] Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
- [ ] Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
- [ ] Breaking backward compatibility
Documentation
- [ ] Affects user behaviors
- [ ] Contains syntax changes
- [ ] Contains variable changes
- [ ] Contains experimental features
- [ ] Changes MySQL compatibility
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.
None
Hi @tiancaiamao. Thanks for your PR.
PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.
I understand the commands that are listed here.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 55.8355%. Comparing base (
40c81c0) to head (27ec2c8). Report is 39 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #52983 +/- ##
=================================================
- Coverage 72.3860% 55.8355% -16.5505%
=================================================
Files 1482 1620 +138
Lines 428754 615656 +186902
=================================================
+ Hits 310358 343755 +33397
- Misses 99088 248679 +149591
- Partials 19308 23222 +3914
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| integration | 38.0545% <91.6666%> (?) |
|
| unit | 71.2309% <100.0000%> (+0.0055%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
| Components | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| dumpling | 53.9957% <ø> (ø) |
|
| parser | ∅ <ø> (∅) |
|
| br | 42.5386% <ø> (+1.3712%) |
:arrow_up: |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: GMHDBJD, ywqzzy
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
- ~~pkg/domain/OWNERS~~ [GMHDBJD]
- ~~pkg/infoschema/OWNERS~~ [GMHDBJD,ywqzzy]
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment