tidb icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
tidb copied to clipboard

copr: increase extra concurrency for small coprocessor tasks

Open you06 opened this issue 2 years ago • 3 comments

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #37724

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

When there are many small coprocessor tasks, the default value of tidb_distsql_scan_concurrency harms the latency. This PR increases extra concurrency when we exactly know there are small coprocessor tasks.

Check List

Tests

  • [x] Unit test
  • [ ] Integration test
  • [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • [ ] No code

Side effects

  • [ ] Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • [ ] Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • [ ] Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • [ ] Affects user behaviors
  • [ ] Contains syntax changes
  • [ ] Contains variable changes
  • [ ] Contains experimental features
  • [ ] Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

Optimize handles read requests by increasing extra concurrency for small coprocessor tasks.

you06 avatar Sep 08 '22 13:09 you06

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • guo-shaoge
  • wshwsh12

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment. After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

ti-chi-bot avatar Sep 08 '22 13:09 ti-chi-bot

/run-all-tests

hawkingrei avatar Sep 09 '22 00:09 hawkingrei

@wshwsh12 PTAL

you06 avatar Sep 14 '22 09:09 you06

@you06 Any update?

cfzjywxk avatar Oct 09 '22 03:10 cfzjywxk

@you06 Any update?

I'm fixing the tests broken by this PR.

you06 avatar Oct 09 '22 07:10 you06

/merge

cfzjywxk avatar Oct 14 '22 07:10 cfzjywxk

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 51e4eaccb31404488443cd8be792a73a672d10d5

ti-chi-bot avatar Oct 14 '22 07:10 ti-chi-bot

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! New failing [1] after this pr merged. These new failed integration tests seem to be caused by the current PR, please try to fix these new failed integration tests, thanks!

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟥 failed 1, success 36, total 37 26 min New failing
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🔴 failed 3, success 14, total 17 13 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🔴 failed 1, success 0, total 1 4 min 34 sec Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟢 all 6 tests passed 23 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟢 all 11 tests passed 10 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 8 min 26 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 4 min 16 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 3 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 2 min 54 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

sre-bot avatar Oct 14 '22 08:10 sre-bot

Any bench result to show the great improvement of this change?

zhangjinpeng87 avatar Oct 14 '22 09:10 zhangjinpeng87

Any bench result to show the great improvement of this change?

I attached the bench result to the description.

you06 avatar Oct 14 '22 11:10 you06

Any bench result to show the great improvement of this change?

I attached the bench result to the description.

When there many requests has fan out characteristics, the test result including p99 should be much more better?

zhangjinpeng87 avatar Oct 16 '22 02:10 zhangjinpeng87

Any bench result to show the great improvement of this change?

I attached the bench result to the description.

When there many requests has fan out characteristics, the test result including p99 should be much more better?

@zhangjinpeng1987 The average latency and p99 should both be better if the coprocessor tasks are not accumulated on the tikv side, and this PR just optimizes the task wait on the tidb side. If there's already task queueing on the tikv side, this change may increase latency.

cfzjywxk avatar Oct 17 '22 03:10 cfzjywxk