Fix wording to reflect poor performance of initial query before optimization
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Fix wording in the explain walkthrough, the current working seems to imply that the initial performance is good (which it is not). The rest of the walkthrough is to improve the performance, so the changed wording seems more correct.
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.
- [x] master (the latest development version)
- [ ] v9.0 (TiDB 9.0 versions)
- [ ] v8.5 (TiDB 8.5 versions)
- [ ] v8.4 (TiDB 8.4 versions)
- [ ] v8.3 (TiDB 8.3 versions)
- [ ] v8.1 (TiDB 8.1 versions)
- [ ] v7.5 (TiDB 7.5 versions)
- [ ] v7.1 (TiDB 7.1 versions)
- [ ] v6.5 (TiDB 6.5 versions)
- [ ] v6.1 (TiDB 6.1 versions)
- [ ] v5.4 (TiDB 5.4 versions)
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
see diff
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?
- [ ] Delete files
- [ ] Change aliases
- [ ] Need modification after applied to another branch
- [ ] Might cause conflicts after applied to another branch
Hi @aquarapid. Thanks for your PR.
I'm waiting for a pingcap member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.
Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.
I understand the commands that are listed here.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.
@time-and-fate: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files.
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.
/ok-to-test
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: qiancai
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
- ~~OWNERS~~ [qiancai]
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.5: #21267.
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.1: #21268.