Adam Pietrasiak

Hey, typegql is not able to automatically infer array types. You'd need to decorate your argument `skillsSwInputDto` like `@Arg({type: [SkillsSwInputDto]}) skillsSwInputDto: SkillsSwInputDto[])`

Do you use `compileSchema` function of `typegql` to compile schema that is using this type? It should perform validation and do exactly what you're asking here. Giving good error messages...

I'll add such support hopefully this or next week.

typegql is trying to be thin layer over original graphql API while type-graphql has some framework-like features like baked in authorization or validation model. With typegql I've tried to make...

I was really willing to implement it from start of this project, but spec of graphql says: http://facebook.github.io/graphql/October2016/#sec-Input-Objects > The Object type defined above is inappropriate for re‐use here, because...

Thanks for your PR. I think that maybe another type may not be even needed. What about auto-converting it when `@ObjectType` is used as input type `on the fly`? So...

Recursive field = User has Dog > Dog has owner User > owner User has Dog > Dog has owner user etc... Recursive = Circular and it's not possible to...

If you'd like to extract it from your app and create PR with example, that would be so awesome @lorefnon :)

Right. I've removed it as `@Guard` was simply not needed abstraction. It was simple function in form of ``` function Guard(options) { return Before(otherOptions) } ``` as I think it's...

I'll think about it, but since I'm thinking now about unifing input and output fields into one universal one anyway, it's loosing it's point a bit so I'll defer decision...