data icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
data copied to clipboard

Novak space is extremally disconnected

Open Moniker1998 opened this issue 11 months ago • 6 comments

#1055

Moniker1998 avatar Jan 18 '25 20:01 Moniker1998

The proof that the extremally disconnected property is preserved by dense sets is really not hard. But we can change the Engelking reference to something more explicit for the benefit of pi-base users. Let me make a suggestion below.

prabau avatar Jan 19 '25 00:01 prabau

see #1202. We may instead remove all references to that fact here and add a meta-property on the page for the extremally disconnected property. So we would have a common reference available for all spaces that need it.

prabau avatar Jan 19 '25 01:01 prabau

As for the Novak space itself, I have not taken time to read the description yet, so I cannot comment on it at this point. If anyone else wants to review this, please feel free.

prabau avatar Jan 19 '25 21:01 prabau

I would add to the definition of the Novak space a reference to item 1 in Counterexamples... to justify the existence of the family $\{P_A:A\in F\}$.

pzjp avatar Feb 20 '25 20:02 pzjp

@pzjp The definition of Novak space needs a whole revamp, but this is for another PR https://github.com/pi-base/data/issues/1218

Moniker1998 avatar Feb 21 '25 03:02 Moniker1998

@prabau could this be reviewed? Note that current definition of Novak space on pi-base and in counter-examples is wrong for some set theory reasons (namely $\mathfrak{c}$ need not be a regular cardinal, we could have $\mathfrak{c} = \aleph_{\omega_1}$), but it's not a problem since the definition of Novak space will have that $\mathbb{N} \subseteq X\subseteq \beta\mathbb{N}$ anyway

Moniker1998 avatar Jul 28 '25 14:07 Moniker1998

@prabau this PR should be a no-brainer to review, it's just meta-property of extremally disconnected spaces

Moniker1998 avatar Dec 10 '25 18:12 Moniker1998

The justification for {S108|P49}, which is used here, refers to item #8 for space #111 in S&S. But that is not what that item is showing. We should replace that by a better justification. For example https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2814978/%c4%8cech-stone-compactification-of-extremally-disconnected-space

prabau avatar Dec 10 '25 22:12 prabau

@prabau I could cite the more general proposition 2 in https://math.stackexchange.com/a/5025114/476484 if that sounds good to you

Moniker1998 avatar Dec 10 '25 23:12 Moniker1998

Yeah, that looks great.

prabau avatar Dec 10 '25 23:12 prabau