Consider splitting versions between the encrypted and the non-encrypted one.

[phonicmouse]

Pros:

• A version aimed at security
• A version aimed at usability
• More features on the unencrypted version such as:
  • Paste compression by using the same database entry for equal pastes
  • Simplified command line interface
  • Possibility to serve raw pastes for things such as scripts (anyway for encrypted version use custom cli)
  • Server-side rendering for what is possible: Markdown ecc.
• Faster loading
• No javascript to get paste's text
• Usability +1000%

Cons

• Harder development
  • The only solution is to modularize the project and make the encryption a plug in or something that we can enable and disable, maybe also paste by paste selecting it during paste creation

[tenchooo]

Not sure we have resources to maintain two really different branches...

[phonicmouse]

We'll do this at some point, obviously its not something that woild happen early.