admiral
admiral copied to clipboard
Update Lab Grading Criteria Metadata
Grading Criteria Metadata NCI-CTCAEv5
-
From lab_grading/assumptions-made-when-grading:
For BASE to be abnormal we compare it with the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) ANRHI, i.e. BASE > ANRHI
- I encountered a situation where ANRHI differs within a subject and lab test due to data from different lab vendors. Should we consider changing the use of ANRHI to BNRIND when determining whether the baseline is normal/abnormal?
-
Some CTCAE grade definitions contain two sets of units, but only one is provided in the current grading metadata. For example,
TERM=Hypoalbuminemia
has only one row forunit = g/L
, so it's not be able to grade forunit = g/dL
can we add more rows to the metadata to cover different units?
Originally posted by @kaz462 in https://github.com/pharmaverse/admiral/discussions/2191#discussioncomment-8074207