Paul Ganssle

@mahmoud If people are willing to use a 10+ year old, unmaintained version of Python, I don't see why a 2-year-old unmaintained version of the (quite stable) `dateutil` library would...

> It's not really fair to call 2.7 10+ years old, or if one does, to use that as a criticism. I don't mean it as a criticism, I just...

The fact that `dateutil` hits a wider swathe of libraries than the ones already dropping Python 3 support is an argument in favor of doing it, not against. As I've...

So yeah, this obviously got way away from me and did *not* go according to plan. I was hoping I would have had more time by now to work on...

I'm tempted to say we should go ahead with this, but I wouldn't be surprised if this would break someone's workflow because it's fairly common to truncate off the sub-second...

Hm.. I don't have time at the moment to figure this out, but I'm fairly sure it's something to do with the libraries the `time` module is implemented in terms...

No, `tm_idst` should be 1, I've filed a bug in Python: https://bugs.python.org/issue39804 This is because Ireland uses [Winter Time](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_time_(clock_lag)). That is why `datetime.now(tz.gettz()).dst()` returns a non-zero (negative) value in Ireland...

@yoch Are you intending to implement 4, 6, 7 and 8 in a separate PR, or is this a "WIP" PR that you plan on updating to include those cases,...

> With regard to the missing points, it turns out that it's more complex and probably need to modify the existing code more deeply, so I plan to make a...

Appveyor failure was due to pytest-dev/py#169, seems fixed now.