Paul Moore

This is likely because setuptools released a new mechanism for implementing editable installs, as part of their PEP600 support. The pdoc3 project is probably not yet aware of the new...

> @brettcannon or @pfmoore might have opinions here? Sorry, I have no opinion here. I'm not a Mac user, personally.

And `dist_info_path` is simply `{name}-{version}.dist-info`, which is mandated by the specification, so doesn't really need a library function (except as a convenience). Edit: The version in `wheelfile` is possibly wrong,...

OK, so thinking about how I'd use a wheel library, I would like to see the following APIs: ### Wheel filename handling I'd like to be able to check if...

I agree with @agronholm - the discussion over on Discourse hasn't yet really addressed transition questions like this (as far as I can recall). I'm not sure what is needed...

Just as a minor note, [PEP 425](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0425/) does not say anywhere that Python 3.7 must support the `py36` compatibility tag. According to the PEP, that's 100% an *installer* decision. The...

> Find all the pyproject.toml files that have `setuptools` in their `[build-system].requires` That sounds more complex than I think you mean - isn't it just the following one line? https://github.com/pypa/sampleproject/blob/main/pyproject.toml#L153

My objection to doing this, which I noted above, still stands.

FWIW, when I originally created this repository, "testing best practices" was explicitly excluded, because there was no consensus. While things have improved, I still don't think there's sufficient consensus that...

I'm confused. The reported error is: ``` ERROR `long_description` has syntax errors in markup and would not be rendered on PyPI. line 2: Warning: Block quote ends without a blank...