Pol Febrer Calabozo

> So wanting to checkpoint your sum, you would need to nodify it ;) Yes, but that's what happens automatically, thanks to your advice on `Ufuncs`. Any operation that you...

One could even argue if the variable name is more stable than the node name. You might change the way you compute a given variable of your workflow, or the...

> You could imagine a Workflow.add_store("variable") in case users wants to examine a temporary variable. Yes, my idea was exactly that! It would generate a copy of the workflow with...

> The workflow returns something, but you want users to be able to access temporary variables defined (in the workflow)! > This is not the same as documenting a function!...

Ok, so it is now clean enough for you to check (not finished yet). I feel it's better to look at the code directly instead of looking at the changes....

Now it's almost finished (I'd say it is finished but I would like to give it a final look after I sleep). All the documentation has been updated (it is...

This works (It's very easy for you to reproduce the test above and you don't need to compile with cython to check that it works since it's in python syntax)....

The API for quickly generating multiple plots has disappeared for now :) The only way to generate a merged plot now is to generate a list of plots and then...

Hmm the discussion for the API will still apply I think

I've done some changes. I realized that if I stored the sparse grid as a CSR matrix where rows are the elements of the grid (if it is a 3D...