Peter Waller

I'm proposing to do the rewrite, merge & push some time around 10:00am GMT, Mon 13th Jan. This would make it just in time for the scheduled LLVM 10 branch...

> Maybe in the main README. We just need to say somewhere not to submit PRs here any more and what to do instead. I guess this could be a...

Summary thoughts: * I think we should start using the llvm-project/llvm issue tracker. * It seems the obvious thing to do. * I'll email to request an update on the...

Responding to @kiranchandramohan: > Will the FIR changes be available before we submit to the LLVM repo? Not something I can speak to. I think that we should not block...

I don't think the sorted output list would reflect commit order. Because yes, there is a generation number in there, but the date can be 'wrong' and reflect a commit...

I've shipped the 202208 pack using this, now requesting review but also happy to merge it as-is.

Because paths are represented differently on Windows and Linux, packs are not currently portable. We could theoretically support this (with limitations) with some effort. What is your use case? Our...

Sorry about the limitation. I can't promise a fix on any timescale, which might rule out elfshaker for your usecase for now. If anyone fancies trying to fix this, help...

This is #13, but happy to leave this open. It's tricky since it will require extra information in the index and a new index format. Definitely something we want to...

It's all of the mode bits. Yes, I think the information can be put in there in principle, with effort. Can't promise a timescale at the moment, apologies.