Peter Munch

I think we discussed to smooth the mesh in such a way that we don't have any hanging nodes at the periodic boundaries!? Is that correct?

This is an important topic. Let's postpone it for now. It is already on the agenda of the next workshop.

@tamiko I guess this issue will be relevant again, once you move your airfold geometry generator to deal.II?

We are too close to the release. Let's postpone this after the release.

What is realistic here before the release? > Deprecate GeometryInfo Remove all uses of that class in the library. would be nice and important. But I am afraid many of...

> As an alternative, we could write {get|set}_future_fe_indices functions similar to [DoFHandler::{get|set}_active_fe_indices](https://www.dealii.org/developer/doxygen/deal.II/classDoFHandler.html#ad6aa6afe657729ade39a45b567aae969). Then the user has to juggle with a container with all future FE indices. This might be a...

Regarding https://github.com/dealii/dealii/pull/12033#pullrequestreview-632922600: > That is a good step forward. We might need to eliminate the global communication again if we can, so I think it's good to keep #12025 open...

@kronbichler Would it be tragic if the current approach becomes part of the next release?

@kronbichler This is in a certain sense related to #12012. Do we want to tackle the hashs before the release or is that too dangerous?

This does not seem urgent.