Peter Bengtsson

If I understand you, it simply means that it's fine that some examples don't have titles and we need to cope gracefully with that. If the examples do have titles,...

Go for it.

@wbamberg Can we close this now? We stopped putting an ID on every iframe so we don't have to worry about repeated IDs. Also, we changed the rendering component to...

Actually, regarding, https://github.com/mdn/stumptown-experiment/issues/53 since the titles are used to turn into unique IDs every example *should* **have** a title.

@wbamberg I'm happy to take a stab at this one. But before I do I would appreciate your input on my issue description.

I'm a huge proponent of never writing unit tests that test the implementation. In this context, it means to NOT write validation code/scripts that nitpick around inside the content. What...

By the way, I think this is the best description of an MVP ever: https://twitter.com/jopas/status/515301088660959233?s=20

This *is* about content linting. But, depending on the angle or how you phrase it, the validation can be considered end-to-end testing because the constituents might pass but when used...

Lots of details to iron out. If we rely on the final rendering to spot problems with the content, it might complicate things and the error messages are possibly going...

> I believe mdn2 should test if it integrates and renders correctly but it should also rely on certain promises the content provides (bcd, stumptown, etc) make Generally, what we...