Peter Bengtsson

> I'm impressed how much validation our writing could get :) The bots are coming for your jobs! ...and it's both a good thing and a lie.

> if call this method with positional arg name, the clear will not work Correct. The invalidation signature needs to the exact same way as the non-invalidation signature.

> But I also want to what can I do to practice this. Practice? Can you try to phrase yourself differently?

Perhaps @wbamberg can see the whole picture better but I'd rather not memoize this function but take a step back and be aware of calling it instead. The `itemFromDirectory` is...

So, perhaps one needs to zoom out even further and eventually do something like this: ```diff + const list = {}; stuff.forEach(thing => { - const relatedLinks = doSomething(thing.directory); +...

Note, this is not urgent because `npm run build-json` only takes about 3-4 seconds. But that'll potentially be exponentially worse when the number of files increases.

> Running `rm -rf .parcel-cache` and starting the watcher again, resolves this. True for my use case too. Also, by making this comment hopefully it'll catch more attention for others...

It also means we can drop things like `removeNode(dom, 'section.Quick_links');`

I'd love to help with this one. Can someone guide me on how to hook up into the markdown conversion so as to write some code that validates?

Yeah, that didn't work either :( Now I get ``` Media resource blob:http://localhost:10000/4e66a94a-e38c-304d-89d5-a1cfaee3e123 could not be decoded. ```  Do you know of any other way...