Perminder Singh
Perminder Singh
@lindapaiste and @raclim I want my issue to be considered for next production, if possible you may add these #2466 #2446 #2483 #2511
Thankyou @raclim for adding these issues.
Hi @raclim and @lindapaiste I want issue #2576 (a high priority issue) to be considered for next production.
> Hi @raclim and @lindapaiste I want issue #2576 (a high priority issue) to be considered for next production. any updates on this issue @raclim ?
> @perminder-17 Seems like it was merged in, so it should be going in the next production release! Okay nice. Thankyou.
Hi, Thanks for taking up this task. I believe I have tested this and it works well. I have a concern: are you planning to write tests for it in...
Hi @krishna4040, I hope you’re doing well! I wanted to check in and see if you’re still working on this issue. Please let me know if there’s anything we can...
Hi @TiborUdvari , it's a great work. Thank you for opening the pull request! I just tested the issues you were facing, specifically the offset for small coordinates being too...
> I didn't like about my solution is that it was a mix between two solutions and I didn't understand the whole problem space This might not be the cleanest...
All the work for this branch is completed successfully. Here's the result of it's working. The main thing was to implement something like Laplacian/Gaussian smoothing to remove the artifacts. But...