It could use more of Moo

[dakkar]

Looking at the source code, I notice that in a few places you're not exploiting the facilities that Moo provides (e.g. you've got common and build do more-or-less what BUILDARGS and BUILD are designed to do, you handle lazy attributes by hand, you have no type constraints). Is there a particular reason for that, or is just general unfamiliarity with Moo? Would it be appreciated if I sent a pull request making the whole thing more Moo-ish? I'd also like to add some type constraints via Type::Tiny, but that can come later.

[perlpunk]

yeah, i'm not familiar enough with Moo and did it the old school manual way so far. I have been refactoring a lot and I hope I have to do less in the future. Would be glad about a PR! I also wanted to add type constraints someday =)

[dakkar]

I'll get started, then ☺