Rocky Linux compatibility

[leberrem]

for better compatibility, it is preferable to use the value "nobody" rather than "nogroup".

PMM-XXXX (optional, if ticket reported)

• [ ] Links to other linked pull requests (optional).

---

• [ ] Tests passed.
• [ ] Fix conflicts with target branch.
• [ ] Update jira ticket description if needed.
• [ ] Attach screenshots/console output to confirm new behavior to jira ticket, if applicable.

Once all checks pass and the code is ready for review, please add pmm-review-exporters team as the reviewer. That would assign people from the review team automatically. Report any issues on our Forum.

[it-percona-cla]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
3 out of 4 committers have signed the CLA.

:white_check_mark: JiriCtvrtka
:white_check_mark: ademidoff
:white_check_mark: leberrem
:x: Alex Tymchuk

---

Alex Tymchuk seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[ademidoff]

Hi @leberrem!

I will have to disagree with your statement, that nobody provides for a better compatibility than nogroup.

I ran a quick test using mongo:latest image and the test does not appear to support your assumption.

$ docker run --rm mongo:latest id nobody
uid=65534(nobody) gid=65534(nogroup) groups=65534(nogroup)

We will have to leave it as is for now if you don't mind :)

Feel free to reopen this issue in case you can provide us more evidence.